Who Was "Shakespeare"?

  • Increase
  • Decrease
  • Normal

Current Size: 100%

  text size


Image of William Shakespeare in sunglasses superimposed on the U.S. flag with the caption Shakespeare Comes to LAThe new movie Anonymous fictionally advances the notion that William Shakespeare didn’t write the plays that history has attributed to him. So who did actually write these plays, according to the movie? Today’s most popular alleged Shakespeare ghost-writer, Edward de Vere. Why has Shakespeare been considered the author for so long and not the rightful de Vere, according to the movie? Apparently because of a conspiracy begun during the cloak-and-dagger regime of Queen Elizabeth I.

 

The question “Who wrote Shakespeare?” has been written about since the early 1800’s but seems to be increasingly embraced by a conspiracy-craving popular culture (this movie Anonymous, PBS Frontline's Much Ado About Something, novels such as Chasing Shakespeares, etc.). Candidates alleged to be the real Shakespeare are de Vere, also known as the Earl of Oxford; Francis BaconChristopher Marlowe; and a host of others, including Elizabeth I.

 

If you are interested in this question, I can recommend two entertaining books on the subject —

 

Cover of the book Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare?Contested Will by James Shapiro — also available via Link+ request (what is Link+?)

This book is a good starting point for those who are as yet uncommitted on the question of Shakespeare authorship. 

The book examines why there is a question of authorship, why many think a theater man incapable of writing the plays, the nature of conspiracies, why the question has persisted for such a long time, and many other topics.
It is a good introduction that covers in detail the claims of Oxford and Bacon. But Shapiro is a Shakespeare scholar, and this book does not hide his opinion that William Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon wrote the plays and poems attributed to him.

 

 

Cover of the book Who Wrote Shakespeare? by John Michell

 Who Wrote Shakespeare? by John Michell

This book is a fine introduction to popular as well as seemingly lesser candidates to the real Shakespeare that have been proposed by conspiracists over the past two centuries.
Michell opens with an analysis of the characteristics possessed by the author of the Shakespeare plays and then marshals evidence for each candidate, including William Shakespeare, with regard to these characteristics in an even-handed, objective but enjoyable way. Some of the author's conclusions might not be as definitive as we would prefer, but this is because the question is not an easy one.

 

  

Of course, the library contains many more titles about this subject, including books written in support of an individual candidate such as de Vere or Marlowe.

 

For a quick online overview of this subject, see Wikipedia’s article on the Shakespeare Authorship Question.

 

For more authoritative and in-depth articles on the subject, see Shakespeare Authorship articles via EBSCOhost. Note: you will need to log in with your San José library card/PIN.

 

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, what do you think? Take our poll and/or drop us a comment.

 



Posted by Michael Sarhad on Nov 5, 2011 | Comments: 4 |
tags:

Comments from our readers...

Authorship debate

It's interesting that you should recommend "Contested Will", the most one sided argument for Will of Stratford, a book which does not discuss the issues at all, but is content to launch character attacks on those who viewed the issue in a different light. Ad hominem attacks, name-calling, and not so subtle put-down are what goes for academic scholarship today. No one stops to think that maybe, just maybe, the academic establishment has a stake in the keeping alive the multibillion dollar Shakespeare industry and are not interested in evidence for another candidate. You have not recommended a single book that supports the case against Will of Stratford, though there are many excellent ones such as books by Diana Price, Charlton Ogburn, Mark Anderson, and Charles Beauclerk, thinking it is sufficient to say that there are many more books on this subject. Not a balanced approach.

Thanks "Anonymous" for your

Thanks "Anonymous" for your comments and for mentioning other suggested authors, some of whom (Price, Beauclerk) show up as authors of books listed via the link to "more titles about this subject" that is provided in the blog post. While I respect your opinion about the academic establishment and even about whether the post is "balanced," I think that reading and recommending one pro-Will book (that I clearly indicated as such) and one obviously not pro-Will book (Who Wrote Shakespeare?) is a balanced approach, especially since the posting also provides link and information for the anti-Will Anonymous movie as well as links to anti-Will websites (for Oxford and Marlowe), to the aforementioned anti-Will books in the library collection, to the Wikipedia article, and to the various academic and non-academic articles from an electronic database.


A small suggestion and a thank you

Thank you so much for posting about this topic in an even-handed manner. I have found the Shakespeare authorship question to be an interesting affair, one that takes you into the wonderful culture of the Renaissance, especially the literary scene. A small suggestion: the link that you provide for the Christopher Marlowe theory goes to The Marlowe Society. The Marlowe Society is a group mainly devoted to advancing the plays and poems that we definitely know Marlowe had written in his lifetime, but they have not endorsed the idea of him being the author of Shakespeare, and so they do not provide a lot of information about the theory on their website. Instead, I suggest "The International Marlowe-Shakespeare Society" as a better resource: http://www.marloweshakespeare.org/ Their organization revolves entirely about the theory, and they advance their case very succintly. One of their members, Michael Rubbo, has directed a PBS documentary about their theory and another member named Daryl Pinksen self punlished a book, "Marlowe's Ghost," which won first prize in the Writer's Digest Self Published Awards. Thank you again for posting this article and providing information for all sides of the aisles. I leave with this: remember that Charles Dickens, Walt Whitman, Charlie Chaplin, Sigmund Freud, Mortimer J. Adler, Mark Twain, Henry James, former Supreme Court Justice Stevens, current Supreme Court Justice Scalia, Ralph Waldo Emerson, and Orson Welles all doubted the legitimacy of Shakespeare as an author. Not all of the Shakespeare doubters are complete weirdos. :)

Valuable comment and link suggestion

Lene, you're very welcome, and your comment is quite readable and interesting even formatted the way it is.

 

I suppose that I might have linked to the Marlowe Society website because its Reading List included the two books recommended in this review. However, I agree that for the purposes of this post, your suggestion is the better resource, and I will edit the link to point to the International Marlowe-Shakespeare Society site.

 

Thank you for your valuable comment on this intriguing topic and your vote for Marlowe.